![]() |
The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Ok, I admit it.........I put a 'sucker' title on this thread to 'lure' you in !
It's a good VIDEO though. I think ALL Americans should watch this. usflag |
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Yep, everyone needs to see these videos. Truth hurts.
|
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
I can't get you tube from here, is that the one with the watermelon demonstration? In full auto an AK is a formidable weapons, so is the M16.
|
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
You're right. The AK-47 is a third-world toy. I'll take yours off your hands.
:15_1_70v: |
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
That 30-06 will OBLITERATE a man
Dam.... you get hit with that .....its over. And another 3 people behind you. Dam T |
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
That video saddened me about my "weak" Saiga.
|
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
I like some of the comments.
Differense between ak47 and m16: ak47: shoot - hit shoot - miss shoot - hit shoot - miss shoot - hit m16: shoot - hit shoot - hit shoot - miss shoot - jammed, your dead. T |
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Quote:
Quote:
|
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Quote:
|
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Here's the stronger .308 Saiga for anyone looking to upgrade (keeping what you already have of course):
http://www.ddsranch.com/cart/bmz_cac...age.150x26.jpg larger image Russian American Armory Saiga 308 Caliber Rifle With Wood Stock And 21.8" Barrel $559.95 Russian American Armory Company Saiga Rifle Caliber: 308 Win Action: Semi-Auto Barrel Length: 21.8" Capacity: 8 Length: 43.3" Weight: 8.5 lbs Metal Finish: Blued Stock: Wood http://www.ddsranch.com/cart/index.p...&keyword=saiga :ok: |
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Sold out on the wood 308
Poof!!! T |
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Judging from that demonstration it looked to me like the shotgun did the most damage. If things got bad and I needed to protect my homestead and family the first gun I would grab for defense would be my trusty 12 gauge semi auto to stop them varmints in their tracks. I certainly hope it never comes to this though, I would much rather help people than hurt them...
|
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Quote:
Here's a .308 in stock - black http://www.ddsranch.com/cart/bmz_cac...age.150x49.jpg larger image Russian American Armory Saiga 308 Caliber Rifle With Black Synthetic Stock And 16.34" Barrel $589.95 Russian American Armory Company Saiga Rifle |
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Quote:
The problem is the other side is blowing out the support collums one by one on peaceful resolution so the only thing that will be left are the most drastic measures. We didnt start it. But we will dam sure finish it. T |
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Quote:
FAL: shoot - hit no need for another shot...next target |
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Bottom line is Assault weapons are scary and ugly looking guns. They are being discriminated by the gunophobes based on looks not power.
|
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Quote:
|
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
I've never had my AR-15 jam with 2k worth of rounds put into it. Just clean it after you're done firing it, and you're set. :)
|
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
NICE! The 9mm did nto do jack. I love ugly guns:s1:
|
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
my 7mm well flip a deer
|
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
My Remington 1100 has more firepower than those foreign AKs with 30 rnd clips of underpowered soviet ammo ...
Communist junk. |
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
My 30mm will flip a car.
|
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Just cut through all the crap....get an M1 Garand and shoot expanding hunting loads....30.06 power and a deadly projectile.......ability to have a lot of quick reload ammo and no need to lug around or buy a lot of magazines (uses an 8 round Enbloc clip). Most deadly battle rifle ever made.
And let's face it.....you will not be out on any 7 day 40 mile long distant patrols like in Viet Nam...we will be fighting (if it ever gets that bad....) from our homes and in our hoods. Unless you have a modified full auto....no real need for 30 rounds....when you can just shove 8 more in in under 2-3 seconds. Anyway and AR-15 is over 8 pounds and the M1 is about 9 pounds...not big diff. Toss that Foreign/Russian crap in the garbage where it belongs (and by the way....i own one....). Get accurate, powerful, quality. Same goes for those overpriced mouse .223 guns (and i also have several of those...). |
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
What about the FN Scar? Overpriced?
|
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Quote:
|
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Quote:
fwiw, i found this vid on the M1: |
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Warning: What you are about to read is from a man who attended graduate school this past Summer to get a state teaching certificate for High School Physics, Math, Biology, Astronomy and Chemistry. I dropped out -- but I got an education in sciences, along with a business degree. I have all the pre-requisite courses in the sciences and I excel at physics.
:thumb.aspx: You are looking at a very simple video demonstration of kinetic energy delivered into a target. When we say something is "powerful" in this way, we are saying it has a high transfer of available kinetic energy. The watermelon is almost 100% water. Water does not compress, so it has almost zero ability to compress at a high speed impact, (example hydraulics) so it must move out of the way with a velocity to match the transfer of kinetic energy input, (e=mv squared) and so it is inelastic. The casing of a watermelon (rind) is frangible also, and so it as well is inelastic. So a watermelon it is much like a frangible ' eggshell' (rind) full of hard (water molecules) billiard balls. By comparison a pillow inside a rubber casing would be very elastic, like air and compressible. This watermelon can be compared to a jug of water, except the melon has some spongy air voids to make the collision more elastic than a jug of water. The biggest difference factor between a jug and a melon however is the frangible casing of a watermelon that ruptures with a minimum threshhold of energy inside. The 9mm and the SPITZER SHAPED 7.62x39 simply do not exceed the minimum transfer of energy required to move enough water fast enough to rupture the melon's casing. And a waterjug no air pockets for interior greater elasticity, but has a tough very elastic shell of plastic, minor difference in principle, except in the visual shattering effect. But the determining factor is the amount of energy TRANSFERRED into the target. The amount of energy transferred is directly proportional to the amount of energy required to PUSH THE BULLET (resistance) though the target medium. (Energy applied to target = energy x resistance to bullet's passage by target) It's very easy to push a 0.30" diameter FMJ spitzer through a watermelon like an icepick. The TRANSFER FO ENERGY is very small and yet the bullet itself has abundant energy to deliver a shattering blow to a watermelon. The energy is not absorbed or lost into the target medium so the bullet carries onward saving almost all it's energy for whatever lies beyond the watermelon. Round nose bullets transfer more energy from the bullet into the target than spire-pointed spitzers. Flat nose bullets transfer more than round noses. Expanded to 180% of original caliber soft points or hollow points transfer more energy than flat nose bullets. This is analogous to "ballistic coefficient". The ballistic coefficient is sometimes not that well understood by shooters. So here is a simple definition:But here we are talking about how well it resists the "drag" or "resistance" of a watery penetration. The .243 and 30-30 probably expand to about 180% of original diameter inside the watermelon. An expansion of 180% in diameter is an expansion of 3.2x the frontal area of a bullet. The frontal area is what transfers energy as it is a directly proportional funcion of drag and resstance. So more water is affected and has to get out of the way, and is thereby imparted energy much like an eggshell full of molecular billiard balls. The shotgun (1 - 1/4 ounce of tiny round balls) has by far the largest frontal area and the lowest ballistic coefficient and therfore the highest rate of direct energy transfer into the melon. ALL THE ENERGY is delivered to the target as no pellet energy is residual after passage. Comparative frontal diameters: The 9mm has a frontal diameter of .357 but the chosen round is NOT a HS hollow point ... Why? It might shatter the watermelon and so look MORE "powerful" than the AK-47. That would be absurd, so let's just make it look like for now the AK-47 is in the same class of "power" as a 9mm handgun ... why not let's just keep it simple? Hmmm... the point of this video bullet "comparison" is -- I see only a watermelon! WOW! .243 x 180% expansion = .44 caliber = frontal area of 0.152" .30 caliber with no expansion = frontal area of 0.070" or half as much as a .243 expanding tip bullet. Compunding this on the military round, it's designed to meet the Geneva Convention and a FMJ spitzer to optimize velocity retention at long ranges. The POINT is very small and so is the resistance to it's passage. It's resistance is very much less than the actual diameter would indicate since it's like an icepick... shape matters when pushing an object into resistance. 30-30 expanded to 180% has a caliber of .54 and so it's frontal area is .229" or 3x the area of the 7.62 and like the mushroomed .243 it is ROUNDED not pointed so it transfers energy (slows down) much more quickly ... almost immeasurably so. Now the 1 1/4 oz of say, # 6 birdshot ... that's 281 pellets each with caliber of .11 and therefore a frontal diameter of 0.0095", so (281 x 0.0095") = 2.67" or 38x the frontal area of the .30 caliber round. Probably few of the pellets go through, or have residual energy after impact, so ALL the 12ga kinetic energy is imparted into the target medium. So we say, Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ? A baseball bat smacked into a watermelon would do much the same thing as a 30-30, seemingly by this test atleast to say a baseball bat is "more powerful" than an AK-47 ... ("power" = energy = swift transfer of a reasonably similar amount of kinetic energy to the target medium, imparting energy and velocity to that inelastic and frangible medium) This is how bursting a watermelon can be related to a pi :wink: Circle's area, diameter, circumfrence calculator You may think my comments are just silliness. But to me this is all just silliness, since it's one type of propaganda countering another type of propaganda. http://image.sportsmansguide.com/dim...0,130&cvt=jpeg Load a Wolf 154gr soft point 7.62x39 and see it perhaps match the .243 or more in watermelon destruction "power". Measure penetration through watermelons however, say of the .7.62x39 FMJ versus the .243 softpoint and the FMJ will FAR exceed it. This video is a biased discussion and demonstration of the effects of (kinetic energy X bullet construction and design) upon a 95% ineleastic watermelon. It counters another biased argument by the anti-assault rifle crowd. It would be perfect to teach a high school physics class. But I don't mean to teach anything but truth here ... every bullet wounded GI should be happy for the Geneva Convention's predecessor perhaps ... but men are not like watermelons I'm sure. :36_3_12: The first full-metal-jacket rifle bullet to be adopted for a military rifle was designed by Major Rubin, director of the Swiss Laboratory at Thun in 1883. FMJ ammunition is acceptable for military use by the countries that signed the Hague Convention of 1899, which prohibits the use of hollow-point or expanding bullets in war between the countries which signed that agreement. It is often incorrectly stated that the prohibition is part of the Geneva Conventions, and that full metal jacket bullets are specifically required.Clearly this is a case of apples and oranges -- but I AGREE an AK-47 has about 80-90% the same "power" (potential kinetic energy) as a .243 or a 30-30. IMO, This is a demostration of essentially nothing but a varying bullet's design effects. |
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Quote:
|
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
i was told the ak47 ammo was made to go though more the one thing are person
|
Re: The KEY is NOT the gun ! ~ So you think AK's are powerful ?
Fun video but........Folks make assumptions based on a watermelon? If it were able to cross ref none would even use a shotgun to hunt right?
I mean unless you want to pick up duck as hamburger :wink: |
| All times are GMT -4. The time now is 10:53 AM. |
Powered by vBulletin® Version 3.8.4
Copyright ©2000 - 2010, Jelsoft Enterprises Ltd.
Copyright = None use it and Link to GIM